For the second time in less than a year, a federal choose dominated that Google has an unlawful monopoly on some promoting tech markets.
On Thursday, U.S. District Decide Leonie Brinkema in Alexandria, Virginia, wrote that Google had harmed advertisers and customers by violating the Sherman Antitrust Act in two markets.
Associated: Could Google Be Forced to Sell Chrome? The DOJ Is Reportedly Pushing For It.
“Google has willfully engaged in a collection of anticompetitive acts to accumulate and keep monopoly energy within the writer advert server and advert change markets for open-web show promoting,” Brinkema wrote within the 115-page opinion, per Bloomberg.
“Along with depriving rivals of the flexibility to compete, this exclusionary conduct considerably harmed Google’s writer clients, the aggressive course of, and, finally, customers of data on the open net,” the ruling continued.
The Justice Division has famous prior to now that competitors may “be restored” if Google would promote a few of its companies. Options have included Google parting ways with its Chrome browser, which has greater than 65% of the search market, or Google Advert Supervisor.
Associated: Firefox Would Like to Remind Everyone It Exists and ‘Isn’t Backed By a Billionaire’
Brinkema additionally wrote that Google “additional entrenched its monopoly energy by imposing anticompetitive insurance policies on its clients and eliminating fascinating product options.”
Google did win a part of the case, notably about its DoubleClick acquisition not harming competitors.
In a statement to TechCrunch, Google’s Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, Lee-Anne Mulholland, wrote: “We gained half of this case, and we are going to enchantment the opposite half.”
“The Court docket discovered that our advertiser instruments and our acquisitions, similar to DoubleClick, do not hurt competitors,” Mulholland continued. “We disagree with the Court docket’s determination concerning our writer instruments. Publishers have many choices, and so they select Google as a result of our advert tech instruments are easy, reasonably priced, and efficient.”
Google is in court again next week in a separate trial on the DOJ’s request for the tech big to promote its Chrome browser.
In August 2024, after a 10-week trial, a federal choose dominated that Google illegally monopolized the net search and search advertisements markets.
The choose wrote in a 286-page opinion that “Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to keep up its monopoly” by way of actions like unique distribution agreements that make Google the default search engine on browsers like Apple’s Safari.
Associated: Here’s Why Google Losing the Antitrust Case Matters, According to a Market Insights Expert
